Monday
29
Sep 2003

Jaxen CVS now has XOM support

(11:06 pm) Tags: [Software]

Looking to execute xpath statements over a XOM object graph?

The anytime-real-soon-now-upcoming Jaxen 1.1 will support it. It is currently in CVS now, so go try it out.

Popularity: 7%

Comments: (0)
Sunday
28
Sep 2003

Why I like: Subversion

(4:32 pm) Tags: [Why I like...]

I have been using CVS for years, and Subversion for about 8 months. The difference now is how easy Subversion is to use. Here are some examples:

What I don’t like about Subversion: all the dependencies and problems I have had/will have with other tools, such as SWIG, neon, etc. Although I will note that these problems are with code external to subversion. So if you just pick up a binary build, you should be completely happy with it.

Will talk about subversion GUIs a little bit later.

Popularity: 15%

Comments: (0)

New Category: In the Shop

(4:30 pm) Tags: [In the Shop]

I have just added a new category named: In the Shop. This is because of the fact that for the last 6 months, I have been scheming to start practicing metalworking in my spare time. My dream since childhood was to mix computers and machines for the benefit of mankind (isn’t this every boy’s drem?), so I have now started down that road.

I just received a lathe and milling machine from Sherline Tools.

Popularity: 16%

Comments: (2)

Upgraded to Subversion 0.30

(4:29 pm) Tags: [Site]

Required a dump/load cycle since the database schema change, but it was generally painless. Great instructions from the svn book. Took about 1 hour to download, build, dump, load, and verify 6 repos. This sysadmin stuff is getting easier, but it is still too hard…

Popularity: 13%

Comments: (0)

How do I retreive a single file from a subversion repository?

(4:05 pm) Tags: [How do I...]

From the mailing list:

svn cat -r REV URL > file

Popularity: 8%

Comments: (0)
Saturday
6
Sep 2003

Spam Spam and Spam

(5:36 pm) Tags: [Life]

I have just settled into handling the previous week’s snail mail this afternoon, and have found that the concepts of making spam cost companies money has me stuffing every credit card application that I receive with the latest grocery store ads, trash, and even other credit card companies inserts. It actually allows me to acheive a zen-like calmness, knowing that if enough people also do this (they must be, since I sometimes have to cut a bar code off of the return envelope), then spam will cost quite a bit more. I know most of America must be tired of it, but since it takes an act of GOD to get anyone to write their congressman to change the situation legally, we must change it at the basest of levels.

I now return to my afternoon of envelope stuffing for a better America :)

Update: now if there were something to do to get AT&T wireless to stop sending me spam to get a phone. They send no return envelope, so they got off too easy.

Popularity: 9%

Comments: (0)

XML is overused?

(11:12 am) Tags: [General]

Say it ain’t so :)

From XML is a stupid transport, comes this gem:

Great XML Rant
Yet day after day, thousands of people are engaged in mapping their objects to xml, transmitting said xml through every medium conceivable to man, then changing this selfsame xml into the objects it supposedly encapsulates. Along the way, chances are you have a whole bunch of things happen to this xml. Transformations, mappings, and other such stains caused by developers masturbating wildly onto this poor ill-begotten xml document.

Even worse is when your genius ‘architect’ feels that xml and dtd’s just aren’t sufficient, that xml schemas must get a look in too. So now you’re passing complicated xml documents backed by schemas and you have two choices. Either you don’t validate against the schemas (basically you slurp up anything well-formed), or you validate against this lovely schema.

is now something that takes days while your validator hmm and ahhs over whether your document is valid. If you’re going to be validating every xml document against its schema at runtime then you really are better off just dictating the xml document to the other side, it’d be faster.

Popularity: 7%

Comments: (0)